Is Justice Really Blind?

English 101 Mr. early days 13 October 2012 Is umpire Re wholey machination? The united States of America bases its whole legal frame around ruse evaluator and is jurist always blind? Since day maven, evaluator has been portrayed as impartial. Ronald Nikkel says the U. S discriminative system is correspond by an elegant lady memory a set of scales in one hand and a sword in her other, while wearing a blindfold.She carries the balances stand for rectitude and the sword symbolizing military group and authority, and she wears the blindfold, symbolizing objective justice for every mess, without preference or discrimination, regardless of identity, wealth, power, well-disposed status, position, or circumstances ( legal expert is non Blind). However, is this always the case? In countless cases, the finding of fact does not bet as if Lady Justice is authentic aloney blind. No matter what is utter, running by jury has its flaws.The hold Justice is non Blind says, I t is not only the impeach who can be improperly tough by the justice system victims in addition suffer the consequence of injustice when monied saturnineenders with powerful connections simply deject a slap on the wrist preferably of creation held responsible to face the consequences of their crimes (Nikkel). Flaws in the jury system affect everyone. The juridic system needs to improveed, society has evolved everywhere time, yet the judicial process has not kept up.Justice needs to be through without bias, where fairness is not just a forensic technicality and where consideration is the homogeneous for all persons regardless of race, religion, creed, or companionable standing(a) (Nikkel). The more(prenominal) or less infamous use of our corrupt judicial system is the trial of Orenthal James Simpson also known as O. J. Simpson. The O. J. Simpson murder trial is one of the most controversial court cases in the abide decade. In 1995 O. J. Simpson was put on trial for the murders of his ex-wife Nicole Simpson and her male friend Richard Gold composition. From the outside feeling in umpteen bulk opinion O.J. Simpson was finish offly guilty. So much incriminatory evidence was found. Douglas Linder says, hair evidence, blood evidence, character evidence, glove evidence, and shoe evidence was all brought in front of the Jury (The O. J. Simpson run). With so much evidence pointing to him, m some(prenominal) Americans were certain O. J. was the guilty of murder. Mr. Simpson had something that many pile did not, cold hard cash. O. J. had the ability to put in an all-star refutation aggroup. The media referred to it as the Dream squad, it consisted of nine high profile lawyers.Douglas Linder figures Simpsons defense team cost between $3 million and $6 million dollars (The O. J. Simpson audition). O. Js defense team worked diligently to raise doubt slightly every piece of evidence that was brought forth, and it worked well. The name O. J. Simpson Trial reads, As America watched at 10 a. m. PST on October 3, 1995, Itos clerk, Deidre Robertson, announced the jurys verdict We the jury in the above entitle action find the defendant, Orenthal James Simpson, not guilty of the crime of murder (Linder).Many quite a little came away from the trial with the impression that silver will buy you justice in The get together States. Money has bought freedom end-to-end history in the United States. of late Cleveland Browns wide receiver Donte Stallworth killed a man while drunk driving. In article published by Globe print it says vehicular homicide is a felony charge that upon confidence will result in a condemnation of between three and fifteen classs of imprison housement with no countersign for at least 1 year (Magee). Three days is the minimum for vehicular homicide. Stallworth received 30 days in jail and two years manse arrest.Stallworth was playing in the next Browns football game game. The main reason Stallworth s sentence was so light was, Donte reached a confidential monetary settlement with Reyes family. What does this say for people who broadcast crimes and be unable to pay off their victims? Debbie Shussel says that, contrary to the trite adage, justice isnt blind in America. Its not blind at all. If you stick the undecomposed dollar amounts in your bank bankers bill, you get a separate kind of justice applied to you (Yes, You Can Buy Justice in America). This was the most glary display of corrupt justice in recent years.According to an article in ground forces Today, Donte Stallworth was super cooperative with authorities and rueful throughout the process and this correlated with his sentence (Davis). Many people are ruthful and cooperative afterward taking persons life with their irresponsible actions, and are still given stiff penalties. It is clear that money will indeed buy you justice in the United States of America. It has been said that America has the best wrong justice system that money can buy. capital of Minnesota Wright states, after more than 16 years in prison I shoot yet to meet anyone who was wealthy when they were convicted.I persistent ago concluded that what people did, in the way of crimes, had no bearing on whether they came to prison Wealth is the determining factor out (The shame of Being Poor). The United States of America judicial system is extremely biased, a reform is desperately needed. many may disagree with this and insist it is the criminal conduct of the poor that leads to incarceration but the evidence indicates otherwise. Paul Write wrote, the past two decades has seen over 100 people exonerated and released from death row after being convicted and sentenced to death.During the same period, hundreds if not thousands more have been released from prison after being exonerated of the crimes they were convicted of. The reasons for the wrongful convictions range from law of nature and prosecutorial misconduct, in competent defense counsel, fabricated evidence, fabrication jailhouse snitches and mistaken eyewitnesses, among others. Yet I have not heard of any wealthy defendants who were wrongly convicted and sentenced to death or prison as a result. Instead, wrongful conviction of the factually innocent seems to be the exclusive province of the poor (The law-breaking of Being Poor).This eyewitness account proves the point, people are being released from prison after the system realizes they were convicted on fictional charges. People of a lower genial class are convicted of almost anything. wealthy people are not convicted for anything, unless, they were caught red-handed. In a country like America, judicial corruption should not be a problem like this. Ronald Nikkel said Justice needs to be done without bias, where fairness is not just a forensic technicality and where consideration is the same for all persons regardless of race, religion, creed, or social standing (Justice is not Blind ).Most people believe this is how the United States Judicial system operates. This is not the case. The United States of America is a great country the people have the ability to make decisions in the government. Citizens of the United States must come together and overturn a well needed reform on the biased judicial system. work cited Davis, Nate. Has justice been served in the Donte Stallworth case? the States Today. N. p. , 6 July 2009. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. Jenkins, Courtenay. Trial by Jury Guilty of Character Flaws. Daily Press. N. p. , n. d. Web. 13 Oct. 2012. Linder, Douglas O. The O. J.Simpson Trial. University of Missouri Kansas City. N. p. , 14 Jan. 2006. Web. 21 Oct. 2012. Magee, Dennis. cleaning lady gets 10-year sentence for vehicular homicide. Globe Gazette. audience Association, 5 June 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. Nikkel, Ronald W. Justice Is Not Blind. Prison Fellowship. Prison Fellowship, 7 Oct. 2011. Web. 13 Oct. 2012. Ogletree, Charles J. , Jr. The Trials Signif icance and Lasting Impact. customary Broadcasting Service. N. p. , 5 Apr. 2005. Web. 13 Oct. 2012. Wright, Paul. The Crime of Being Poor. Prison Legal News. N. p. , 22 Oct. 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012.